Metric No. | Description | Link |
---|---|---|
1.1 | Number of all Programmes offered by the Institution during the last five years | View |
2.1 | Number of students year-wise during the last five years | View |
2.2 | Number of graduated students year-wise during the last five year | View |
3.1 | Number of full time teachers year-wise during the last five years | View |
3.2 | Number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years | View |
4.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year-wise during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | View |
Key Indicator – 1.4 Feedback System (20) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
1.4.1 | Mechanism is in place for obtaining structured feedback on curricula/syllabi from various stakeholders. | 10 | |
1.4.2 | Feedback process of the Institution may be classified as. | 10 |
Key Indicator - 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (10) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
2.1.1 | Due consideration is given to equity and inclusiveness by providing reservation of seats to all categories during the admission process. | 3 | |
2.1.2 | Student Demand Ratio, applicable to programmes where State / Central Common Entrance Tests are not conducted. | 4 | |
2.1.3 | Student enrollment pattern and student profile to demonstrate national/international spread of enrolled students from other states and countries. | 3 |
Key Indicator - 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity (15) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
2.2.1 | The Institution assesses the learning levels of the students after admission and organises special programmes for advanced learners and slow performers | 7 | |
2.2.2 | Student - Fulltime teacher ratio (data for the preceding academic year). | 8 |
Key Indicator - 2.3 Teaching - Learning Process (25) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
2.3.1 | Student-centric methods are used for enhancing learning experiences by: | 8 | |
2.3.2 | Has provision for the use of Clinical Skills Laboratory and Simulation Based Learning. | 5 | |
2.3.3 | Teachers use ICT-enabled tools for effective teaching and learning process, including online e-resources. | 6 | |
2.3.4 | Student:Mentor Ratio (preceding academic year). | 6 |
Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (25) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
2.6.1 | The Institution has stated learning outcomes/graduate attributes as per the provisions of Regulatory bodies which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents | 10 | |
2.6.2 | Incremental performance in Pass percentage of final year students in the last five years | 15 |
Key Indicator - 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (30) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
2.7.1 | Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process. | 30 |
Key Indicator - 4.2 Clinical, Equipment and Laboratory Learning Resources (30) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
4.2.1 | Teaching Hospital/s, Equipments, Laboratory and clinical teaching-learning facilities including equipment as per the norms of the respective Regulatory Bodies | 15 | |
4.2.2 | Describe the adequacy of both outpatients and inpatients in the teaching hospital during the last five years vis–a–vis the number of students trained and programmes offered (based on HIMS / EMR) within 500 words. | 5 | |
4.2.3 | Availability of infrastructure for community-based learning | 7 | |
4.2.4 | Is the Teaching Hospital / Clinical Laboratory accredited by any National Accrediting Agency? | 3 |
Key Indicator - 4.5 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (10) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
4.5.1 | Average percentage of expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component during the last five years | 5 | |
4.5.2 | There are established systems and processes for maintaining physical and academic support facilities: (laboratory, library, sports facilities, computers, classrooms, etc.) | 5 |
Key Indicator - 5.2 Student Progression (40) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
5.2.1 | Average percentage of students qualifying in state/ national/ international level examinations during the last five years | 10 | |
5.2.2 | Average percentage of placement /self-employed professional services of outgoing students during the last five years | 15 | |
5.2.3 | Percentage of the graduates in the preceding academic year, who have had progression to higher education. | 15 |
Key Indicator - 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (20) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
5.3.1 | Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at state/regional/national/international events (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years | 10 | |
5.3.2 | Presence of Student Council and its activities for Institutional development and student welfare. | 5 | |
5.3.3 | Average Number of sports and cultural activities / events/ competitions organised in the Institution per year | 5 |
Key Indicator - 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
5.4.1 | The Alumni Association/Chapter (registered and functional) has contributed significantly to the development of the Institution through financial and other support services during the last five years | 5 | |
5.4.2 | Provide the areas of contribution by the Alumni Association / chapters during the last five years | 5 |
Key Indicator - 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (10) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
6.1.1 | The Institution has clearly stated vision and mission which are reflected in its academic and administrative governance | 5 | |
6.1.2 | Effective leadership is reflected in various Institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management etc. | 5 |
Key Indicator - 6.2 Strategy Developments and Deployment (15) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
6.2.1 | The Institutional Strategic plan is effectively deployed. | 5 | |
6.2.2 | Effectiveness and efficiency of functioning of the Institutional bodies as evidenced by policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures etc. | 5 | |
6.2.3 | The University has implemented e-governance in the following areas of operation | 5 |
Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (20) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
6.4.1 | Institutional strategies for mobilization of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources | 8 | |
6.4.2 | Funds / Grants received from government / non-government bodies / philanthropists during the last five years (excluding scholarships and research grants covered under Criterion III) | 7 | |
6.4.3 | Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly | 5 |
Key Indicator - 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
6.5.1 | Institution has a streamlined Internal Quality Assurance Mechanism | 10 | |
6.5.2 | Quality assurance initiatives of the Institution include: | 10 | |
6.5.3 | Impact analysis of the various initiatives carried out and used for quality improvement | 10 |
Key Indicator - 7.2 Best Practices (30) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
7.2.1 | Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual. | 30 |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20) | |||
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | |
---|---|---|---|
7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words | 20 |